VIR21-1

Indicator: Participants opinion

Evidence: This session was generally deemed an important area of technology transfer, especially during this COVID-19 pandemic, in which LDCs have been hit hardest. At least 12 participants who answered the survey marked this session as one of the most valuable.

Indicator: Participation – frequency and quality of the interventions / questions raised, contribution to group work

Evidence: Questions raised include: - How to develop local production of medicines as a means to tackle issues related to access to medicines? - More information sharing on technology transfer through compulsory licenses - How can LDCs benefit from technology transfer projects already offered in other countries?

Indicator: Responses to questionnaires and other written submissions – relevance, comprehensiveness, quality of the substance and form, respect of specifications

Evidence: According to the survey, the session was rated as follows: 14% as unsatisfactory; 38% as satisfactory; 33% as successful; 14% as very successful Thus this session received a satisfactory/successful rate of 86% total.

Indicator: Participants opinion

Evidence: At least 11 participants who answered the survey marked this session as one of the most valuable.

Indicator: Participation – frequency and quality of the interventions / questions raised, contribution to group work

Evidence: Questions raised include: - Who are the focal points in the reporting Developed Country Members to which LDCs can apply for assistance under Article 66.2? - What possibilities are available for technical assistance, what is the application procedure? - Are there any reporting Developed Country Members interested in assisting Burkina Faso with the valorization and labelling of cotton-derived products?

Indicator: Responses to questionnaires and other written submissions – relevance, comprehensiveness, quality of the substance and form, respect of specifications

Evidence: According to the survey, the session was rated as follows: 19% as unsatisfactory; 24% as satisfactory; 38% as successful; 19% as very successful Thus this session received a satisfactory/successful rate of 81% total.

Indicator: Participants opinion

Evidence: At least 5 participants who answered the survey marked this session as one of the most valuable.

Indicator: Participation – frequency and quality of the interventions / questions raised, contribution to group work

Evidence: Questions raised include: - Were there any projects related to medical waste management included in the Secretariat summary? - As plastic waste is a crucial environmental problem, are there any technology transfer projects that Burkina Faso can benefit from in this regard? - How can Burkina Faso benefit from the REPIC programme? - What is the procedure to benefit from the programme on energy offered by Australia? - How can LDCs participate in the IP and Green Technology Innovation event?

Indicator: Responses to questionnaires and other written submissions – relevance, comprehensiveness, quality of the substance and form, respect of specifications

Evidence: According to the survey, the session was rated as follows: 19% as unsatisfactory; 29% as satisfactory; 38% as successful; 14% as very successful Thus this session received a satisfactory/successful rate of 81% total.

Indicator: Participants opinion

Evidence: At least 5 participants who answered the survey marked this session as one of the most valuable.

Indicator: Participation – frequency and quality of the interventions / questions raised, contribution to group work

Evidence: Questions raised include: - Why was there a notable absence of West African LDCs benefitting from technology transfer programmes in the area of ICT? - How can LDCs benefit from technology transfer in other fields without first having a solid ICT base?

Indicator: Responses to questionnaires and other written submissions – relevance, comprehensiveness, quality of the substance and form, respect of specifications

Evidence: According to the survey, the session was rated as follows: 5% as unsatisfactory; 33% as satisfactory; 48% as successful; 14% as very successful Thus this session received a satisfactory/successful rate of 95% total.

Indicator: Participants opinion

Evidence: At least 6 participants who answered the survey marked this session as one of the most valuable.

Indicator: Participation – frequency and quality of the interventions / questions raised, contribution to group work

Evidence: Questions raised include: - How can LDCs benefit from programmes offered by other international organizations, such as WIPO?

Indicator: Responses to questionnaires and other written submissions – relevance, comprehensiveness, quality of the substance and form, respect of specifications

Evidence: According to the survey, the session was rated as follows: 14% as unsatisfactory; 33% as satisfactory; 43% as successful; 10% as very successful Thus this session received a satisfactory/successful rate of 86% total.